The video was excellent... good quality, beautiful scenery. But resistance is very poorly synced with gradient even at the macro level, eg. video slope goes negative but resistance continues uphill for another 70 m. Also, the undulating terrain is very poorly reproduced so that what you visually experience is not what your legs are feeling.
miw61 - 4year
Yes I know the resistance is not always synced. I have no influence on that, I always see to it by manipulating the raw data's start and end point from my Garmin Fenix3 HR watch with respect to the duration of the video and also edit strange data values when there is a stop for a traffic light due to the fact that this can affect the data values. I also do a elevation profile check of the data before I use it, but I have noticed that the resistance we get after the courses are uploaded does not always reflect the slope changes from the real data neither in time or slope values. I have done other video courses where these courses pass the same small hills, but the resistance when riding the same "hill" can vary a lot from each course. I have also noticed a change in resistance in general if I compare my rides a little over a year ago with rides on the same courses today. I can ride much faster and complete the courses with less power applied now than earlier. I know my weight has changed a little bit since I have lost som fat 😀 but not so much that this can explain these changes. I use the same equipment and I have a separate bike mounted on my trainer all the time. The trainer itself is equipped with a built in powermeter that should be reasonably accurate and the power readings align well with other powermeters if I use them on the bike at the same time.
Tour de France Grand Depart in Denmark (2022) Stage 2 (Video Part 2)
I have been riding and video recorded the complete stage, but as the battery can not record for the total duration of the stage if I could ride it in one ride the stage have been split into 5 parts.